Search for: "UNIVERSAL SERVICE V POST-CONFIRMATION" Results 481 - 500 of 914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm by Katelynn Catalano
FLASHBACK FRIDAY In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Professor Rachel Rebouché of Temple University argued that June Medical Services v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
In the case of Voyias v IC and LB Camden (EA/2011/0007), Camden Council has been ordered to disclose to a former member of the Advisory Service for Squatters lists of empty properties meeting certain descriptions. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:50 am by Howard Knopf
   Thanks   Anne   Anne Pottier   Associate University Librarian, Library Services     [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Information commissioner Elizabeth Denham has welcomed the UK government’s confirmation that it will implement the GDPR despite the outcome of the UK referendum. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The Crown Prosecution Service released a statement which is available here. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Derrick George
  The Importance Of Seeking Legal Counsel  In the landmark case Gideon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Nowadays author’s rights are among the universally recognized human rights. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:55 am by Peter Mahler
S’s demeanor was “terse and disrespectful” and confirmed that a collaborating university hospital “would not work” with his hospital if Dr. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:13 pm by Daithí
As well as repeating the university and fair use points above, the last point refers to the current debate on ‘three strikes’, particularly the alleged lacuna identified by the High Court in EMI v UPC last November. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
This employment finding confirms claims that there are now far more PRs than journalists working in Britain. [read post]