Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2007, 6:31 pm
In Crawford v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:28 pm
This underutilised type of patent is extraordinarily useful in several circumstances which will be discussed below. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am
Pennsylvania State Univ. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:37 am
Finally, Screentime and Five Divas submitted that SBS and Talpa acted unlawfully by riding on the coat-tails of the reputation of the POPSTARS sign, resulting in damage to Screentime and Five Divas. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
Elena Chachko discussed EU sanctions and international humanitarian law in her examination of the Court of Justice of the European Union case, A v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
While the goods could be deemed to form part of a homogenous group and the marks were found to be similar – indeed there are several animals whose heads could be used in stylized character to serve as origin identifier, for example cats – problems arouse in relation to the third requirement: the alternative presence of the dilution or the tarnishment or the free-riding of the earlier mark as consequence of the use of a later mark. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Sheeran v Chokri Part 2: Admission of similar fact evidence | New Year, Same Creative Authorship Requirement in US Copyright | Reader discount for IPKat book award titles! [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
Scope of Texas statute shifting liability between manufacturers and sellers of defective goods Fresh Coat, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
Village of Hobart (Reservation Boundaries) Stephen C. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Patent No. 8,092,876 entitled COATING COMPOSITIONS FOR CANS AND METHODS OF COATING and owned by Valspar Sourcing. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:10 am
Mr Mandl had used a mark (Styriagra) that was similar to an earlier mark with a reputation (Viagra). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
The FDA regulators expressed severe doubts about the use of the fish oil coating before Atrium released the C-Qur patch, warning that there could be severe, and life-threatening, allergic reactions. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:45 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:28 am
Of course, the globeandmail treated a different licensor, NTP, quite differently in reporting the NTP v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 7:31 am
Facts: This case (AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:25 pm
" The case cite is Lebewohl v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:20 pm
Take the recent unpublished case of People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:22 am
It's simply awe inspiring to stand next to the massive Saturn V rocket that powered man's first step on the moon). [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:41 pm
The Sixth Circuit court of appeals, in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:51 pm
National Lead Co. v. [read post]
