Search for: "US v. Crow" Results 481 - 500 of 813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2013, 7:46 am by Ruby Powers
The lingering social costs of another era’s Jim Crow legislation show us that this is not the way to go. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 7:58 am
One book that made you cry: Richard Kluger's Simple Justice, about the Civil Rights movement from Jim Crow to Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by Ilya Somin
These include the reality that most blacks and virtually all women were excluded from the political processes that produced the original meaning of the most important parts of the Constitution, the claim that Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
Though a lot of us have been crowing about the benefits of good non-subscriber plans, they are not without risk to the employer, some of the same issues with fair treatment and delivery of benefits still apply as in standard workers' compensation cases.A Texas employer discovered that tough reality when the 5th District Court of Appeals at Dallas determined that the employer's alternative benefit plan wrongfully terminated its payments to a seriously injured worker less… [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Refusing to let a Muslim employee conduct prayers in a lobby used by other businesses, in the HR director’s office, or in a hallway, did not violate Title VII where the defendants offered to let him pray off-site each day as he already did on Fridays and his suggestions would cause undue hardship, found a federal district court in Kansas, granting summary judgment for the defendants (Farah v A-1 Careers, November 20, 2013, Crow, S). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Coke's inauguration restored Democratic control in Texas.Imagine if, upon receipt of the Supreme Court order in Bush v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  Social science was the stated difference between Brown’s (1954) rejection of Jim Crow education and Plessy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:14 am by Alfred Brophy
Board of Education legitimized those who sought to destroy Jim Crow a century later, decisions like Prigg v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am by lawmrh
Joseph, CR 87-08901, counsel for Joseph argued that the black man’s conviction should be vacated because the State used, or failed to use, peremptory strikes on the basis of race, in violation of Batson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm by Josh Blackman
Alabama) are now being used to protect conservative mega-donors: The same scrutiny the Court applied when NAACP members in the Jim Crow South did not want to disclose their membership for fear of reprisals and violence now applies equally in the case of donors only too happy to publicize their names across the websites and walls of the organizations they support. [read post]