Search for: "US v. Ellis" Results 481 - 500 of 817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2013, 9:01 am by Gritsforbreakfast
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:38 am by Dennis Crouch
The Court cites its 1962 decision, Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Contrasting this with US tort liability for contributory and vicarious infringement, Martin demonstrated how far EU doctrine extended beyond it. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am by Susan Brenner
That is not the language Congress used in the statute before us. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  She used a sports team analogy to encapsulate FRAND disputes. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:37 pm
Mary Wong Moderated by legendary blogger and Leason Ellis attorney Marty Schwimmer, the Fordham agenda switched to generic top-level domains (gTLDs) and their attendant headaches. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
  A group of California vineyard operators will be represented in the case of Horne v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 6:56 am by Alfred Brophy
 As I've been saying for a while now, though the case for reparations has been largely defeated in courts (though we should take notice of Polley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
A case worth noting, from the end of January: in Heafield v Times Newspaper Ltd [2013] UKEAT (17 January 2013), the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that the use of bad language about the Pope did not constitute harassment within the meaning of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Goodwin v NGN (b) Which three letters have been used to anonymise a Claimant and also a Defendant this year? [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
UK information is available here; more detailed US data can be found here. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by INFORRM
(a)   Mrs Justice Slade, Mr Justice Lindblom and Mrs Justice Nicola Davies (b)  Hacked Off, Children In Need, Reprieve (c)  Times Newspapers Limited, Andrew Gilligan, Viagogo Limited (d)   £65,000, £90,000, £125,000 (e)   Mr Justice Eady, HHJ Radford and The Recorder of Belfast (f)   Citation PLC v Ellis Whittam Limited, Waterson v Lloyd & Anor , Rothschild v Associated Newspapers 3. [read post]