Search for: "US v. Morales" Results 481 - 500 of 7,230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
That sexual activity properly belongs only within such marriage and therefore any other kind of sexual activity is morally problematic. iii. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm by Aaron Moss
Coakley claimed, among other things, that Boyce was forced to film a scene in which he had to kiss Nicole, who was 14 at the time, against Boyce’s objections that it was “morally wrong and would leave him open to allegations of sexual misconduct. [read post]
Disrupt & Dismantle Threat Actors Pillar 2 discussed the commitment to use “all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests,” focusing on heading off “sustained cyber-enabled campaigns that would threaten the national security or public safety of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:53 am by Michael Oykhman
R v Lamy held that the use of a sex toy may be considered a weapon in a sexual assault if the accused “knowingly or recklessly used the object without the consent of the victim in circumstances where injury was reasonably foreseeable. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
Imagine, say, that there was ambiguity in the funding provision about whether appropriations could be spent on vaccines that had been approved only for emergency use. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:40 am by Michael Oykhman
Use A key consideration when establishing “use” of a credit card is established in a case called R v Tuduce, 2014 ONCA 547 (CanLII). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Ryan Merkley
” A concept within the fair use doctrine is something called transformative use. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
But when it comes to a related question of political morality - "To what ideal should citizens aspire in political debate? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:57 am by Michael Oykhman
Conversion is “an act of interference with a [motor vehicle] inconsistent with the right of another, whereby that other is deprived of the use and possession of it” (see: R v Stewart, 1988 CanLII 86 (SCC), [1988]  SCR 963). [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
This reflects the deeply held moral intuition that ordering a thing done is tantamount to doing it oneself. [read post]