Search for: "US v. PARIS"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2007, 5:04 am
A decision of the Paris Court of Appeal (4th Chamber), the chamber dealing with IP cases, decides in favour of Hasbro (a US company) against a French company. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:57 am
Paris and then to Poland. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
The US reaction to this defeat was to tighten rather than loosen the criteria for use by anyone of the US Department of Commerce label. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am
Corp., 262 AD2d 436, 436 [2d Dept 1999]; Polzer v TRW, Inc., 256 AD2d 248, 248 [1st Dept 1998]; Banque Nationale de Paris v 1567 Broadway Ownership Assocs., 214 AD2d 359, 360 [1st Dept 1995]; see also Sullivan v MERS, Inc., 139 AD3d 419, 420 [1st Dept 2016]; Burger v Singh, 28 AD3d 695, 697-698 [2d Dept 2006]), there is no basis for imposing such a duty on Grover & Fensterstock based on its acting as Live Well’s attorney… [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Not sure you can get a map of equivalent changes v. each district court/court of appeals cases in the US. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
The case is titled Bella Bella, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
The case is Educational Credit Management Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am
But yesterday brought us an administrative law undercard: argument in PDR Network v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am
Without its historical characters, Midnight in Paris would be reduced to a pedestrian domestic squabble. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
- Asolo v Red Bull. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
See, e.g., Rossi v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
X. v Mr. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
PatentsFollowing the Munich Regional Court's decision a few months ago to issue an (ex parte) injunction ordering the defendant to withdraw an anti-suit injunction filed in a US court (an thus an anti-anti-suit injunction), the Paris Court was asked to issue a similar injunction, ultimately granting an anti-anti-suit injunction in IPCom v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:47 pm
In Parisi v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
You are a tourist in a foreign country, say Paris, France. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
It gives effect to article 6bis of the Paris Convention. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:01 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:46 pm
In Marks v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 8:04 pm
See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). [read post]
