Search for: "US v. Robert Barnes"
Results 481 - 500
of 584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Robert Burrell: heritage brand cases in Australia, some of which produce really undesirable results. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post (subscription required) that “[i]t’s hard to overstate what a decision about this law … will reveal about this Supreme Court and its jurisprudence on what remains one of the nation’s most politically divisive topics. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at voting patterns on the Court and concludes that although this Term “lacked the blockbuster decisions of years past, [] it appeared to make one thing clear: George W. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
" That distinction seemed less troubling to Roberts. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the court could announce today whether it will review a lower court decision holding that Wisconsin’s “redistricting plan violated the Constitution’s First Amendment and equal rights protections because of partisan gerrymandering”; he explains that the case, Gill v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on an amicus brief filed in the case by a group of “cake artists” that “is drawing outsize attention for its unique approach,” because “it relies on 38 pictures of cakes in various states of construction and completion. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
Elena Kagan used the word so often at her hearings before the Committee that, if it were to be taken as an oath of permanence, the only case it might allow revisiting is Korematsu v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am
” Additional coverage of the final stretch of the nomination process comes from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, Michael Shear and Adam Liptak at The New York Times, and Nina Totenberg at NPR. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:09 am
Briefly: In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks back at Justice Sotomayor’s first year on the Court, concluding that “the court’s first Hispanic member, and only its third woman, has hardly had the typical first-termer’s experience. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Other coverage comes from Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Josh Gerstein of Politico, James Vicini of Reuters, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, and Charles Johnson of the Billings Gazette. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
” Additional coverage comes from Hansi Lo Wang of NPR, Tara Bahrampour and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Ari Berman of Mother Jones and Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal, who report that “[d]uring arguments in April, U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
In Munaf v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
” Robert Barnes of the Washington Post reports on calls by affirmative action foes for the Court to grant cert. in Fisher v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
Robert O. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Roberts v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
Thanks to Kevin Brooks for compiling all these cases, and special thanks to Aurora Temple Barnes for making 20 new case pages (and rephrasing the questions presented to SCOTUSblog style) on such short notice. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Gill, noting that the “Supreme Court has never found a plan unconstitutional because of partisan gerrymandering,” and that “[i]f it does, it would have a revolutionary impact on the reapportionment that comes after the 2020 election. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “those who saw oral arguments in the cases now collectively known as Bostock v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes compares Kagan’s limited “paper trail” to that of previous nominees; he characterizes her record as “at times contradictory, or at least ambiguous. [read post]
