Search for: "US v. Sierra"
Results 481 - 500
of 897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 1:40 pm
Using the expansive conjunction "whenever," the Congress made plain its intent to grant the Administrator authority to prohibit / deny / restrict / withdraw a specification at any time." [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:38 pm
As explained by the Appeals Court, Defenders of Wildlife and Sierra Club (collectively, Defenders) sued U.S. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
In McBurney v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:00 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:36 am
In Dahlia v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Madigan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:44 am
The Alabama Environmental Council, Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Our Children's Earth Foundation (Citizens) support the 2011 disapproval and ask the Panel to affirm that action. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Drawing amicus support from the Sierra Club as well as the island municipality of Vieques, Puerto Rico – famous for its crystal-clear waters, sweeping vistas, and the occasional deposit of depleted uranium – Sanchez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Sierra Chemical Co. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
In The Use of Expert Witnesses in Breach of Fiduciary Duty Cases, attorney Luke Lantta writes on allegations of undue influence and breach of fiduciary duty that arose in the trust case Sierra v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm
for Env't v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am
Thus, "although the police had a valid basis for the initial encounter, there was nothing that made permissible any greater level of intrusion' " (id., quoting People v Howard, 50 NY2d 583, 590, cert denied 449 US 1023). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm
Respondents claim that Petitioners did not administratively exhaust the issue of whether the STB properly granted the exemption and that the issue is not properly before us. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm
Further, the Appeals Court rules, "We are not now ruling on the methodology the EPA used to determine the SILs. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
