Search for: "United States of America v. Burden" Results 481 - 500 of 1,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
The Anti-SLAPP Law The anti-SLAPP law provides that "[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:29 am
This is the ruling of Mr Justice Arnold late last month in Innovia Films Ltd v Frito-Lay North America Inc [2012] EWHC 790 (Pat), in the Patents Court (England and Wales). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  Before viability, the state can regulate abortion as long as it does not impose an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:20 am by Joel Goldstein
Under industry custom, Frescati and the United States contend, charterers who wish to assume a lesser due-diligence burden or eliminate a safe-port clause can do so contractually. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States actually had a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals before it had one for children, so this is no mean feat! [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:50 pm by Elin Hofverberg
Although Lockwood lost this case, she would return to the Supreme Court in 1906, at the age of 76, representing the Eastern and Emigrant Cherokees in the United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Demisse Habteselasie
The United States needs a constitutional amendment. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
”  The plaintiffs defined their putative class as including “all governmental entities in the United States of America who have been caused to expend monies" for certain drugs as a "result of the off label promotion by the defendants. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
Corruption swirled around the highest levels of the United States and of China. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
Under the standard announced in Casey, a state can regulate pre-viability abortion only as long as it does not impose an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Chamber of Commerce in support of respondentAmicus brief of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America in support of respondent (forthcoming)Brief for respondent RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]