Search for: "United States of America v. Bush"
Results 481 - 500
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
“Sherron, even if it’s the last $10,000 you have, you have to use it to hire an attorney. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Bush (commander in chief): release Ray and the others today/tonight! [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46) New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office) South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP) Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46) Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for ‘Made in… [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm
Department of Justice and the larger law enforcement and regulatory apparatus of the United States government. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:42 pm
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 577 (2005): “It is fair to say that the United States now stands alone in a world that has turned its face against the juvenile death penalty. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya that… [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
--An action under paragraph (1)(A) shall be governed under the rules and procedures set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United States Code. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Alternatively, the alien can be “paroled,” i.e., released into the United States on conditions pending resolution of his application. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
Bush agreed with the basic outlines of the bill. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
Levitin also said that the problem could “cloud title to nearly every property in the United States” and could lead to trillions of dollars in losses. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the two biggest home mortgage investing companies in the United States.[8] The two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are privately-owned corporations authorized to make loans and loan guarantees.[9] The two giants operate in American's secondary mortgage market to ensure that mortgage bankers and other lenders have enough funds to lend to home buyers at lower rates.[10] The GSEs purchase… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin Ninth Circuit Opinion (ACLU) United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
