Search for: "United States v. Alaska"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 6:06 pm
Physical limitations and judgment come into play from the outset, to be sure.Nevertheless, that was the situation in central Alaska that led to Nieves v Bartlett which has been winding its way to the SCOTUS for the past 4-years. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:52 am
Crazy.So when I saw that this opinion was about someone who'd been prosecuted by the U.S. military, and then by the United States, I thought: "Oh. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:28 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:25 am
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlTexas v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
S.Res.100: A resolution recognizing the heritage, culture, and contributions of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian women in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935); The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all, and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
(Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
The oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:20 pm
Seventeen state attorneys general are seeking to intervene in Juliana v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
As the United States Supreme Court observed in Harris v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
United States.[7] The Court, however, quickly backed down from its anti-delegation rule in Schechter, possibly because of FDR’s court-packing plan. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
Forty-six states, the District of Columbia, and the United States all provide some form of DNA testing. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
District Court took up a loose end left by the Supreme Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
