Search for: "United States v. Arnold"
Results 481 - 500
of 596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
While the rest of the world has its eyes trained on the United States, desperately seeking first sight of In re Bilski, patent litigation is still taking place elsewhere, as is evidenced by last week's carefully-framed decision in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Arnold (Patents Court for England and Wales).Right: the IPKat is all in favour of dressings that don't press on his… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:57 pm
In clause 5 of that agreement, the watchmaker undertook not to object to the engineers' use or registration in the United Kingdom of certain "excluded goods". [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:33 pm
It is considered the ‘bible’ for any professional who makes psychiatric diagnoses in the United States and many other countries, and hence what gets in and what does not has long ranging consequences about how MHP's and judges and lawyers view certain behaviors and functioning. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:13 pm
Luongo, Watchlists in United States and Canada: An Intricate Web, p.157 # Ruwantissa Abeyratne, The NW 253 Flight and the Global Framework of Aviation Security, p.167 # Special Report # Ruwantissa Abeyratne, Legal and Aeronautical Issues Concerning the Earthquake in Haiti, p.183 # Arpad Szakal, Conference Report European Air Law Association: 7th Munich Liability Seminar, p.195 # Case Note # Pablo Mendes de Leon, ATA and others v. the UK Secretary of State for… [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:51 am
Arnold III http://www.thurmanarnold.com [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
But while Alito remained in government, Garland’s career also included several years in private practice at Arnold & Porter, where he was named a partner in 1985. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
Arnold v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 7:47 am
Giles, United States Fire Ins. [read post]
Update: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable HoursDefendant law firm moves to strike 'scandalous' material.
18 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Earlier: Lawsuit of the Day: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable Hours Law - Lawyers & Law Firms - Services - United States - Business and Corporate Law [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
’” First United Bank v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19] Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:28 pm
State v. [read post]
