Search for: "United States v. Bases"
Results 481 - 500
of 37,950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
United States et al., a decision of the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 8:26 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
From Wednesday's opinion in H.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
United States dissent, Congress could delegate fact-finding to the Executive Branch, but not “policy judgments. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 3:41 pm
And Carson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 4:27 am
Treme v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
The first panel, “Breakthrough Verdicts: Legal Decisions Shaping the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals,” will discuss landmark rulings and regional perspectives from Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia, Africa, Europe, and the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm
United States, 96 Ct. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Whereas Warren Court activism was generally in the service of democracy, some of the most egregious Roberts Court decisions--gutting the Voting Rights Act, invalidating bipartisan campaign finance regulation, rendering challenges to partisan gerrymandering impossible, and much more--seem designed to make government in the United States less democratic. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
Such an analysis reflects piecemeal reasoning based on how the state intends to use the information in a specific case, contrary to the broad, purposive approach required by s. 8’s constitutional status. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
” Finally, in last week’s United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:44 am
United States 23-638Issue: Whether, to comply with 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
United States (23-726) and Idaho v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
