Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 481 - 500
of 847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2011, 1:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:56 am
The applicable United States Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of between 210 and 262 months of imprisonment, but the district court imposed a sentence of only 72 months. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
This case is on appeal from the district court's resentencing of Joseph Story in light of United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 1:46 pm
United States, . . . 137 S. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:05 am
This was illustrated in a December 12, 2017 decision, United States v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:08 am
Another new Harvard Law Review casenote â€â [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:07 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), that facts relevant to the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines need not be submitted to a jury. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:48 pm
" United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:06 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 1:34 pm
The court concludes that the defendants should have done better, or rather ""'are merely rhetorical and unsupported by countervailing proof.'" United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
Here is the starting paragraph:This appeal concerns the bounds of "reasonableness" after United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Today, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm
Today, in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
United States; City of Ontario v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:20 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am
Responding to the government’s argument that the Supreme Court has on previous occasions recognized that a sentencing reduction based upon Section 3582(c)(2) is not governed by the constitutional or remedial holding of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:55 am
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:38 am
" United States v. [read post]
