Search for: "United States v. Locke" Results 481 - 500 of 1,935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  The California Supreme Court doesn't feel that issue's sufficiently important to grant review.But the United States Supreme Court does. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm by John Ellis
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: UNSR Letter of Allegation Indigenous Prisoners Religious Freedom Excerpt: A pattern of restricting American indigenous prisoners’ religious freedoms is currently occurring throughout the United States. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
For example, in Chester, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWHC 2923, a prisoner claimed that his rights had been breached as prisoners in the UK are barred from voting in elections. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am by Andree Blumstein
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is the exclusive representative empowered to negotiate with Illinois about wages, hours and conditions of employment for Janus’ bargaining unit. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:38 pm
Supp. 2d 557 [E.D.N.Y. 2008], citing United States v Locke, 529 US. 89, 109, 120 [2000], which found the Graves Amendment Constitutional.However, the "Graves Amendment" does not apply to taxi medallions which are leased. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:08 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  The case involves the doctrine of First Sale in the United States, which underlies library lending and also allows consumers to buy and sell used books, DVDs, etc. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 3:25 pm
After serving his sentence, Divito was extradited to the United States in 2005 to face drug-related charges there and he pleaded guilty. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]