Search for: "United States v. Morrison" Results 481 - 500 of 1,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
United States, the case of a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s paramour. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
” Second, is the mere placement of a buy order in the United States for the purchase of foreign securities on a foreign exchange sufficient to allege that a purchaser incurred irrevocable liability in the United States, such that the U.S. securities laws govern the purchase of those securities under the Second Circuit’s decision in Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am by Broc Romanek
Applying Morrison, Second Circuit Affirms UBS Credit Crisis Securities Suit Dismissal As Kevin LaCroix explains in his blog, after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:42 am by Lyle Roberts
” In addition, the Second Circuit test for whether a transaction is domestic is if “the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry our the transaction within the United States or when title is passed the United States. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:09 am by Sandy
The Second Circuit as  a matter  of first impression, considered whether the bar on extraterritorial application of the United States securities laws, as set forth in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:12 pm by Florian Mueller
Not one judge has so far considered this patent valid, other than Judge Koh, of course.And Morrison & Foerster's Harold McElhinny (whose Apple v. [read post]