Search for: "United States v. New York Indians" Results 481 - 500 of 622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing… [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am by Nabiha Syed
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by James Bickford
United States; both are scheduled for argument in February. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
Allegiance Corporation (TTABlog) Another restaurant name dispute – District Court S D New York: Nothing Heavy, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm by Marie Louise
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California: For divided infringement, proof of agency not required to establish ‘direction and control’: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm by Christa Culver
New York State Urban Development Corporation, dba Empire State Development CorporationDocket: 10-402Issue(s): 1) Whether it was error for the Court of Appeals of New York to disregard the principles enunciated in Kelo v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
City of New York, USCA, 2nd Circuit, 08-1839-cv, Decided November 11, 2010The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a District Court ruling enjoining the City of New York and the New York City Police Department from investigating and disciplining a New York City police officer based upon testimony or participation in a pending lawsuit, concluding that hearsay testimony is admissible to support the issuance of a preliminary… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
In the combined decision issued for the Watertown and Indian River cases, the Court of Appeals -- New York State’s highest court -- articulated a much more liberal view regarding the use of arbitration to resolve public sector collective bargaining issues. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:36 pm by Coplan, Prof. Karl S.
In fact, our own New York State DEC has from time to time taken the position that waste site remediation pursuant to a consent decree is exempt from New York’s CWA SPDES permitting program even though the remediation activities discharge pollutants from a point source into waters of the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm by Kelly
Productions LLC v Aftermath Records (IP Osgoode) District Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
’ (PatLit) PCC Update 1: new regime, new judge, old case, old rules: Technical Fibre Products Ltd & Anor v Bell & Ors (PatLit) Formula 1 fight for right to race as Nelumbo Nucifera (IPKat) Summary judgment, but no quick fix on costs: Patents County Court decision in Nike International Ltd & Ors v Bateman (IP finance) United States US Patents USPTO announces launch of second peer to patent pilot program (Inovia IP) (IP Watch)… [read post]