Search for: "United States v. Nixon" Results 481 - 500 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
  Answer:  Because of the effect on “further appellate review” – which means the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Carolyn Shapiro is associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:35 am
Central planning, not the welfare state, is what was incompatible with individual liberty. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am by Melanie Fontes
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:15 am by Jack Goldsmith
Olson, 487 U.S. 654, 695 (1988),” which included protecting the life of a U.S. solider, “without being ‘justified by an overriding need’ to promote legitimate objectives of Congress, Nixon v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by Scott Bomboy
One significant case decided outside of the Court’s normal term time period was United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm by Scott Bomboy
United States after the Supreme Court took the case on Feb. 28, 2024. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Rather than discussing how life will change for various groups of people in America, I want to engage in informed speculation about how the legal system in the United States will look in a few years. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  If the Supreme Court is an elite largely influenced by elites, the United States is not a democracy in the classical Aristotelean sense, but a mixed regime where aristocrats and plebes both participate in governance. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:22 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 The man I'm talking about is the president of the United States, and the social media platform is Twitter. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
And if the president and Bolton do decide to attack Iran or North Korea, will they do so in conformity with the laws of the United States and the law of armed conflict? [read post]