Search for: "United States v. Powers" Results 481 - 500 of 20,467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am by Will Baude
  In the course of considering certain "Special Situations" (p. 29), we consider who all might have authority to enforce Section Three with respect to the constitutional ineligibility of an individual for the office of President of the United States. [read post]
Unlike Europe’s comprehensive privacy law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the United States only has a conglomeration of laws that target specific types of data. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
  For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
In the months before Abraham Lincoln's inauguration in 1861, anti-Lincoln men in Washington plotted to undermine the Union and derail the peaceful transfer of power. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
” For example, the Appointments Clause gives a president the power to “appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
 The whole point of the Fourteenth Amendment was to rein in State power and to impose some uniform national rules. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), Moore: The Overlooked Excise Power, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 1759 (Dec. 4, 2023): Moore v. [read post]