Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 481 - 500 of 3,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm by Dan Ernst
Textually, I argue, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:33 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:58 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
   Kennedy's view feels familiar: There is nothing new about regarding mixed-race people as a problem in the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 2:08 pm by Unknown
Bernhardt (Indian Child Welfare Act)United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Interior (Land into Trust; Alaska Tribes)United States v. [read post]
There are many individuals and groups in Michigan who lost as a result of yesterday's United States Supreme Court decision in Schuette v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:38 am
United States, 464 U.S. 814 (1983). [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:33 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Since the SCOTUS decisions in United States -v- Windsor and Hollingsworth -v- Perry last summer, the civil rights push for same-sex marriage equality has picked-up momentum throughout the country. [read post]