Search for: "United States v. Tam"
Results 481 - 500
of 917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:28 am
The opinion, United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:07 am
That case is Matal v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
The opinion is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
United States ex rel., Karen T. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 6:49 am
Dimaya: Whether 18 U.S.C. 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:40 pm
The Court, as an example, cited that a qui tam relator possesses Article 3 standing to bring suit under the False Claims Act, which authorizes a private party to bring suit to remedy an injury that the United States suffered. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 12:48 pm
The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
Steury v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 8:33 am
Hart v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 8:11 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:16 am
" United States, ex rel. [read post]
8 May 2008, 1:16 pm
United States, 05-1272 (U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
The United States may intervene in such an action as it did here. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
Customs, they were brought by a whistleblower under the qui tam provisions of the FCA in United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Moreover, this case further tilts the circuit split in favor of United States ex rel. [read post]