Search for: "United States v. That Certain Real Property" Results 481 - 500 of 1,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
The absence of a de minimis threshold for business tangible property tax liability imposes substantial compliance costs on many businesses while yielding a negligible amount of additional revenue for local governments. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:26 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
         Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:41 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
These expensive and potentially efficiency-reducing measures are not installed in the United States (though here there are other more “standard” precautions). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm by Bona Law PC
Earthquake Disclosures If a property has a water heater installed, sellers must certify that they have complied with state laws regarding proper anchoring of the unit to prevent earthquake damage. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm by Bona Law PC
Earthquake Disclosures If a property has a water heater installed, sellers must certify that they have complied with state laws regarding proper anchoring of the unit to prevent earthquake damage. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
After reading the opinion in a recent Tax Court case, Najafpir v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm by Giles Peaker
The real problem for the Council in attempting to justify the ten years’ residence qualification and uplift is the paucity and inadequacy of their evidence. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
Anonymity may provide a would-be poster’s only real protection against such consequences. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The court awarded the plaintiff the two properties upon considering a number of factors, including that the real estate was acquired during the marriage; the defendant=s income increased substantially during the marriage, while the plaintiff delayed her own career advancement and remained at home caring for the parties= four children; the businesses, which were marital property and would have been subject to equitable d [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The court awarded the plaintiff the two properties upon considering a number of factors, including that the real estate was acquired during the marriage; the defendant=s income increased substantially during the marriage, while the plaintiff delayed her own career advancement and remained at home caring for the parties= four children; the businesses, which were marital property and would have been subject to equitable d [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:40 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
The Sixth Circuit made clear that Lagosabrogated the holding of United States v. [read post]