Search for: "United States v. Various Articles of Device"
Results 481 - 492
of 492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2007, 2:52 pm
The first, Riegel v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
The court observed that even the articles upon which the plaintiffs' expert relied specifically noted that ADRs could not be used to calculate the relative frequency of adverse reactions. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
But one state judge held in September 2006 that it was unconstitutional, asserting in Graham v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[16] Moreover, unlike the theory prevalent in the United States today, the Romans were not concerned with writing down laws for the masses to read for themselves. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
As stated above, the regulations explicitly state that area sources are exempt from Title V permitting requirements, unless otherwise required by law. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.
A2190
Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA2228
Lafayette (MS) -- Provides for the… [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
