Search for: "V D"
Results 481 - 500
of 76,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 2:56 am
Regina v Williams (Jason John) [2010] EWCA Crim 2552; [2010] WLR (D) 274 “As a matter of statutory construction, fault or other blameworthy conduct on the part of the defendant was not required to establish that he was guilty of an offence under s 3ZB of the Road Traffic Act 1988 of causing the death of another person by driving while unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured; and it was sufficient that the driving was a cause of the death, provided that it was a more than… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:18 am
Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group plc [2012] EWCA Civ 137; [2012] WLR (D) 35 “The date from which interest ran on an award of costs in the county court in favour of a successful litigant was, by reason of article 2 of the County Court (Interest on Judgment Debts) Order 1991, the date the order for costs was made, not the date on which costs were assessed or agreed. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:51 am
Meister v Speech Design Carrier Systems GmbH (Case C-415/10); [2012] WLR (D) 116 “European Union law did not entitle a worker who plausibly claimed to meet the requirements listed in a job advertisement and whose application was rejected to have access to information indicating whether the employer engaged another applicant at the end of the recruitment process. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:20 am
Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v Okonkwo [2010] EWCA Civ 1113; [2010] WLR (D) 251 “If, following an application by a creditor for an order to gain information from a judgment debtor, the debtor failed to attend court the judge should not use a committal order, even when suspended, as little more than a vehicle for fixing a date for an effective adjourned hearing. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:15 am
Regina (KM) v Cambridgeshire County Council [2012] UKSC 23; [2012] WLR (D) 171 “When a local authority was performing its duty under section 2 of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970 and assessing the amount to be awarded to a disabled person, it was not irrational for the authority to use its resource allocation system and its upper banding calculator to arrive at a figure which would enable the disabled person to purchase the necessary services required to… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:24 am
Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer (Case C-49/11); [2012] WLR (D) 195 “Article 5(1) of Parliament and Council Directive 97/7/EC of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts meant that a business practice which made the information referred to in that provision accessible to the consumer only via a hyperlink on a website did not meet the requirements of the Directive, since that information was neither ‘given’ by that… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:46 am
Midgulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimique Tunisien [2010] EWCA Civ 66; [2010] WLR (D) 34 “Where the court had found that there was a valid contract governed by English law to conduct arbitration of disputes in England, it would be inappropriate for one party to the contract to seek a foreign court to declare that there was no such agreement and the English Court could restrain that party who had submitted to the jurisdiction of English court from instituting or continuing… [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:14 am
InsuranceWide.com Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs; Revenue and Customs Comrs v Trader Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 999 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 156 “Companies which offered introductory services, in order to channel would-be customers to insurers by electronic means, and which received a commission in the event of a contract of insurance being concluded [...] [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:50 am
Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry and others; Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry and others (No 2) [2012] UKSC 35; [2012] WLR (D) 238 “A disclosure order obtained in civil recovery proceedings did not authorise sending information notices to persons who were outside the United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:25 am
R (BA (Nigeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (PE (Cameroon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 119; [2009] WLR (D) 77 “A right of appeal against the Home Office's refusal to revoke a deportation order was exercisable from within the United Kingdom. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:46 am
BA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; PE (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; [2009] UKSC 7 ; [2009] WLR (D) 344 "A person who had made an asylum claim or a human rights claim within the meaning of s 113(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 was [...] [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:56 am
EN (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; KC (South Africa) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 630; [2009] WLR (D) 213 “The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Specification of Particularly Serious Crimes) Order 2004, which was made under s 72(4)(a) of the 2002 Act and listed a [...] [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:00 pm
[Mexico][Petition granted][Stay pending appeal denied] Godinez v Godinez, 2023 WL 4295763 (D. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:44 am
Regina v Gilham [2009] EWCA Crim 2293; [2009] WLR (D) "In relation to the offence of selling a device which is primarily designed, produced, or adapted for the purpose of enabling or facilitating the circumvention of effective technological measures, it must be established that there has been copying of the whole or a substantial part [...] [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 11:37 am
I realized this morning I'd neglected to post that the CAC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:27 am
R v A [2008] EWCA Crim 2908; [2008] WLR (D) 374 “The expression ‘new and compelling evidence … in relation to the qualifying offence’ in s 78(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 was not restricted to further evidence either from an individual who suggested that the defendant had admitted after the trial that he was [...] [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 8:10 am
In Cisneros v Lopez, 2016 WL 7428197 (D. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
A. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
