Search for: "Vermont Department of Justice"
Results 481 - 500
of 689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 2:31 pm
” The hearing was little more than an opportunity for Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) supporters in Congress, and anti-LGBT activists, to vent their frustration with the Obama administration for (correctly) concluding that a critical section of DOMA is unconstitutional, and would no longer be defended by the Department of Justice in court. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:33 pm
Hearing it from the Justice Department is not amusing. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
Morton also brushed aside questions of constitutionality of the seizures, saying that the process was developed with the Justice Department to ensure compliance. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
"Leahy recently pressed the Department of Justice for an update on the status of its ongoing investigation into Peanut Corporation of America's (PCA) involvement in a massive product recall and Salmonella outbreak in 2008 and 2009. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:57 pm
However, Congress may defend the law in court in place of the administration, and on March 4, 2011, Speaker of the House John Boehner announced he was taking steps to defend Section 3 in place of the Department of Justice. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am
After Judge Polster rendered his decision, the Department of Justice moved to intervene in the case, for reconsideration of the decision, and for affirming the constitutionality of the law. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
Justice Dooley began his analysis with a sarcastic hypothetical letter from DPS to Claimant. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:30 am
Perhaps New York law firms could handle such disputes on a per diem or pro bono basis for the Commission if it came to that, or perhaps a law school’s sports law clinic, such as those at Valparaiso or University of Vermont, could step in. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:04 pm
Justice Dooley, however, will have no quarter with this reasoning. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:09 am
A former Vice President of Operations for GMCR during 2010 ("CW6"), stated that while the accounting department in Vermont told CW6 to book shipments to MBlock as a sale, the SEC [Securities and Exchange Commission] questioned the existence of an arms-length relationship between GMCR and MBlock. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
I think one of the most fascinating developments in criminal justice over the course of the past decade has been the reinvigoration of early-release opportunities for prison inmates -- parole and parole-like mechanisms. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:12 pm
Alabama 2008: established new program permitting early release of certain older inmates with serious medical conditions[1] Arkansas 2003: authorized early release of nonviolent offenders to reduce prison overcrowding[2] 2005: authorized transfer of inmates to community-based transitional housing up to one year before parole eligibility[3] California 2009: expanded earned-time opportunities; permitted parole to be granted without a hearing in some cases[4] 2010: authorized medical parole… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:26 am
Porter, The Sentencing Project, The State of Sentencing 2009, at 3 (2010) [hereinafter Porter, 2009]. [18] Vera Institute of Justice, The Continuing Fiscal Crisis in Corrections 18 (2010). [19] Ryan S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:46 pm
If the Justice Department does not challenge such decisions as Pedersen et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:06 pm
" The lynchpin of today's announcement was the Justice Department's conclusion that government discrimination against gays and lesbians requires heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause (whose principles apply to the federal government through the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) sent a letter Tuesday to the Department of Justice inquiring about the status of the department's investigation into Peanut Corporation of America (PCA), the company implicated in a massive product recall and Salmonella outbreak in 2008 and 2009. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:30 pm
Patrick Leahy's letter to the attorney general requested an update on the Department of Justice investigation that began in 2009. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:30 pm
Patrick Leahy's letter to the attorney general requested an update on the Department of Justice investigation that began in 2009. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Because they want to see justice done. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
