Search for: "W O
v.
M D"
Results 481 - 500
of 820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Foreword by Nancy D. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:18 pm
’People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
O., Nr. 6 der Entscheidungsgründe; J 6/91, ABl. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et al, 2000) •… [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:58 am
C is for CBC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 4:04 pm
With respect to the advertising law claim, the Court found that National Energy had made false and misleading representations about the efficiency of its competitor’s water heater tanks, price increases and non-compliance with industry standards (claims suggesting that Direct Energy was unable to supply “Energy Star” certified water heaters). __________________ For more information about our regulatory services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on… [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am
” Q is for the Queen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
O. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
The case was assigned to the Honorable Gregory M. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Reid and MacKinnon's checklist on protection of IPR in China (IP Dragon) China/Hong Kong: WIPO Copyright Treaty and WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty in effect in Hong Kong after PRC (IP Dragon) Protect your IP rights in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Finland M&M and Taloustutkimus survey of most respected brands in Finland (Class 46) France Electronic filing of trade mark applications (Class 46) … [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Metaphysics: Toney v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
I’m going to start by going back to some earlier cases, Two Pesos v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:33 am
’ The court inquired, `[o]kay? [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
Carven D. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(IP Frontline) US Patents Percentage of patents that were initially rejected (Patently-O) Design patents: Sailing through the PTO (Patently-O) Patents and the auto industry bailout (Patently-O) Tips for assisting the judge and jury in patent cases (IP Watchdog) US patent counts, Q1 2009 (Patent Librarian's Notebook) What good are patent method claims? [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 633 (O’Connor, J., concurring) [“Our polestar instead remains the principles set forth in Penn Central itself and our other cases that govern partial regulatory takings” (emphasis added)]; Koontz v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 633 (O’Connor, J., concurring) [“Our polestar instead remains the principles set forth in Penn Central itself and our other cases that govern partial regulatory takings” (emphasis added)]; Koontz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
The record supported Supreme Court’s determination that the husband’s actual income in 2016 was $49,000, notwithstanding the fact that his 2016 W–2 form reported income of approximately $91,000. [read post]
