Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re"
Results 481 - 500
of 733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan's Stay Motion is in Re: Richard Allenv. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(IPSpotlight) (Patently-O) (Patents Post Grant Blog) Surcharge on USPTO Fees in FY2011 – Boom or Bust? [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
West Penn Power Co., 147 F.3d 256, 263 & n.13 (3d Cir. 1998) (“[w]e do draw on the allegations of the complaint, but in a realistic, rather than a slavish, manner”; rejecting “unsupported conclusions and unwarranted inferences”); Columbia Natural Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:15 pm
" "In an attempt to prove its claims, AMC submitted re-constructed evidence, presented contradictory testimony, and engaged in evasive litigation tactics. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Natural Res. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
The government isn't prosecuting them or suing them, just asking them. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:45 am
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 1:21 am
Fearful Courthouse Workers Wonder if Mold Infestation Led to Judge's Death
Daily Business Review
Two studies at Miami's historic David W. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:44 pm
" In re Gartside, 203 F.3d 1305, 1317 (Fed. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:58 am
Lockformer Co., 166 F.3d 1379, 1383 (Fed. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:39 am
See International Paper Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Michener, and T. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 5:36 pm
.- What a crock of s--t! [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
Bell Hill Vineyards, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STENTALLOY for alloys used to make medical devices: In re Metalwerks PMD, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Boston Red Sox - Red Sox and White Sox oppose e.SOX for cellphone sleeves: Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership and Chicago White Sox, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
In theory, the Court “has an obligation to satisfy itself … of its own jurisdiction," Steel Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
The Godoy opinion won't lay to rest all questions that might arise, though. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
”); In re Comiskey, 554 F.3d 967, 973 (Fed. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Shaw Rose Nets (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) District Court S D California: In re TS Tech and In re Genentech do not apply where the requested venue is a neighbouring district: HP Hood LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
” The relists aren’t the only ones stuck on repeat. [read post]
