Search for: "WALKER v. US " Results 481 - 500 of 2,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Robert then tackled Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, in which the CJEU viewed the impression of the average internet user as being an essential element of the test of whether the use of another's brand as a keyword conveys an impression that the use of that brand suggests that the user's business is connected with that of the brand owner. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 5:53 am
"World v Trump by Anonymous espiON9E on ScribdMeanwhile- It's Superbowl Sunday, and our preliminary review leads us to believe you should eschew the points, take the Falcons and the odds, and slam all your dough on over and tails for the coin toss. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This will not cut it under Iqbal.Also, while plaintiff says his termination for yelling and using profanity was a pretext as two younger employees used profanity but were not disciplined, the complaint does not say whether these employees were similarly-situated. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Allowing NML Capital’s appeal, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Clarke, Mance, Collins and Walker) held that it was entitled to do so. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
Schwarzenegger, available in pdf here, Walker ruled that the ban on same-sex marriage violates the equal protection and due process guarantees of the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:54 pm by Dale Carpenter
Well, nothing has changed except that the stakes have been considerably raised today in a maximalist decision, bringing us one step closer to Perry v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]