Search for: "WILLIAM HUGHES"
Results 481 - 500
of 966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2013, 9:05 am
Chesterton, William Hazlitt, Fernando Vallejo, los Ensayos impopulares de Bertrand Russell, la demoledora carta de Robert Hughes “La Sohoiada o la mascarada del arte” y las vejatorias e impertinentes expresiones de Roberto Bolaño en contra de Octavio Paz. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v The Citizen (Gloucester), Clause 5, 11/04/2013; North Wales Fire… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:05 pm
April is also National 9-1-1 Education Month.Those graduating today and their agencies are: KimberLee Arms - Bingham County Sheriff’s Office Ashley Auger - Shoshone County Sheriff’s Office Victoria Bailey - Nez Perce County Sheriff’s Office Rhonda Beauchamp - Lewis County Sheriff’s Office Peter Cangany - Kootenai County Sheriff’s Office Gordon Christopherson - Oneida County Sheriff’s Office Jeanine Dilworth - Minidoka County… [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:14 am
Hughes v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
This is how William Blackstone explained the law in his Commentaries on the Laws of England. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
In Williams v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:16 am
Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984). . . . [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
Resolved cases included: Chris Magee v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 22/02/2013; Mr Nicholas Thomas v The Independent, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Steven Wolf v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Orhan Bicer v Middleton Guardian, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Darren Meldrum v The Scottish Sun, Clause 3, 21/02/2013; Mr Simon Sanderson v Daily Mail, Clauses 1, 12, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v Daily Record, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v The Sun, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; A woman v… [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:47 am
Conference AnnouncementThe Future of Law School September 26 - 28, 2013University of Alberta Faculty of LawEdmonton, Alberta, CanadaREGISTRATION IS NOW OPEN AT: http://www.lawschool.ualberta.ca/centenary/conference.aspxCONFIRMED SPEAKERS INCLUDE:- Professor Harry Arthurs, Dean Emeritus, Osgoode Hall Law School- Dean Kim Brooks, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University- Dean Irwin Chemerinsky, California Irvine School of Law- Dean Ian Holloway, University of Calgary, Faculty of Law-… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Four - Ashcroft v Foley, Cairns v Modi/KC v MGN, Cammish v Hughes and Rothschild v Associated. 9. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Amos and Hugh S. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:34 pm
The Brief Against Obama (2012) by Hugh Hewitt33. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 11:13 am
The Brief Against Obama (2012) by Hugh Hewitt33. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For this reason—because it is, as William Blackstone said, “better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer”—we selectively and strongly favor Type 2 errors (where we falsely acquit a guilty person) over Type 1 errors (where we falsely convict an innocent person). [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
To be fair, there are lots of great initiatives underway in Canada, but, as William Gibson might say, the digital legal information future is already here, it’s just not widely distributed. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
To be fair, there are lots of great initiatives underway in Canada, but, as William Gibson might say, the digital legal information future is already here, it’s just not widely distributed. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:20 am
William Wemms, James Hartegan, William McCauley, Hugh White, Matthew Killroy, William Warren, John Carrol, and Hugh Montgomery, soldiers in the English 29th regiment of foot, were accused of murdering Crispus Attucks, Samuel Gray, Samuel Maverick, James Caldwell, and Patrick Carr. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:53 am
Additional decisions following Zhang include: Hughes v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, Chief Justice Hughes spoke as follows respecting the copyright monopoly granted by Congress, ‘The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, Chief Justice Hughes spoke as follows respecting the copyright monopoly granted by Congress, ‘The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors.’” This case, in turn, was cited by the Supreme Court in the 1984 Betamax case to support the idea that “The monopoly privileges that Congress may authorize are neither unlimited nor primarily… [read post]
