Search for: "Waits v. Smith" Results 481 - 500 of 889
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Smith decision (a decision that I myself support, though I also support the existence of jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction Religious Freedom Restoration Act statutes). [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 2:32 am by Jeremy
Phonographic Performance Ltd v Simon Noel Raine, a Chancery Division (England and Wales) ruling of Stephen Smith QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge on 5 March, deals with a procedural issue that has cropped up frequently in recent patent and trade mark trials, but less so in those involving copyright: when to stay infringement proceedings.In short, Raine was the sole shareholder and director of several companies that operated nightclubs in England. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 2:15 pm
 (Parenthetically, one advanced by my friend and colleague at USD Law, Frank Partnoy, in his recent book Wait: The Art and Science of Delay.) [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Siemenski: we don’t really know because there are too few cases, because of the great imbalance of power between those sending the notices and those receiving them—big corporations v. individual users.Coble for Bridy: should Congress create incentives for voluntary systems to address infringement, and if so what? [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
A while ago, I posted about the en banc oral argument in a Ninth Circuit case called U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The crux of the dispute—between Chief Judge Kozinski and the dissenting Judge Smith—is whether Cindy Garcia has a copyright interest in her performance. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm by Joe Patrice
[Adam Smith, Esq.] * Is there a right to online anonymity? [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
 Star attractions are Bird & Bird partner and Cyberleagle blogger Graham Smith and our very own Eleonora Rosati. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:00 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And how much.That question made it to the Supreme Court this morning for oral argument in Doyle Randall Paroline v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
 According to the recent Generics v Teva/Yeda decision, the burden of proof should therefore be on the alleged infringer, not the patentee. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 13 C 1850, slip op. [read post]