Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes" Results 481 - 500 of 559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm by H. Scott Leviant
El Torito Restaurants, Inc. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 723, 734; Dunbar v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Tyson is relying heavily upon the Court’s 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores v Dukes, which blocked the creation of a nationwide class of present and former workers for the giant retail chain claiming discrimination in wages paid to female workers. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
In McReynolds, which was decided after the Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court’s order serves as another reminder that, even after Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:00 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
More motions to dismiss being granted If ECJ-based (and other food label claims) have a limited shelf life going forward, their end would likely be precipitated not by the content of new FDA ECJ guidance but rather because cases like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Bruce Nye
  Here are a few glimpses of what’s new: Class Actions:  Those who do not themselves live under rocks already know that the US Supremes poleaxed the employment discrimination case against Wal-Mart Stores in  Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:37 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young As readers of our blog know from prior posts, we have argued successfully before several courts that the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am by Greg Mersol
  While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 That decision, issued by Judge Leonard Sand, held that because the named plaintiffs were not current employees, the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]