Search for: "Washington v. Roberts"
Results 481 - 500
of 4,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 5:32 pm
Adler has a post titled "Why did the court grant cert in King v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:27 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 3:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:42 am
” Public Utilities Comm’n. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:40 am
There are many stories today, including: "Court hears Ind. self-representation case," reported by Maureen Groppe, IndyStar Washington Bureau; and "The rights of the Mentally Ill: High Court Weighs Self-Representation," reported by Robert Barnes of the Washington Post. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm
Robert Cottrol is a professor at the George Washington University Law School who has written on the Second Amendment, including a 1991 Georgetown Law Journal article, “The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration,” which was cited by Justice Thomas in his concurring opinion in McDonald Yesterday’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined "Justices question next step for massive Wal-Mart discrimination suit. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:56 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court split over judicial review for asylum seekers facing quick removal. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court won’t revive Kansas voting law requiring proof of citizenship (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court takes sides in interstate river flow fight (Pamela King, E&E News) Supreme Court puts off ruling on Trump census case to exclude undocumented immigrants (Pete Williams, NBC News) Why Trump’s attempt to steal the election was too much even for Republican… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:54 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes invites readers to “reflect on the fact that — once again — folks had to sleep on the sidewalk for days to see or hear the Supreme Court at work,” waiting for up to four days to gain access to the oral argument earlier this month in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:10 am
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Barrett was trustee at private school with anti-gay policies (Michelle Smith & Michael Biesecker, Associated Press) Supreme Court split in Pa. election case raises questions about how a Justice Barrett would rule (Seung Min Kim & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court’s Pennsylvania mail ballot ruling tees up test for Barrett (John Kruzel, The Hill) Poll: Majority says… [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court questions California law requiring antiabortion centers to disclose that the state provides abortion services. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:58 am
“Ruth Bader Ginsburg back on bench as Supreme Court resumes hearings”: Robert Barnes and Mark Berman of The Washington Post have this report. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:48 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has an article headlined “Fittingly, Supreme Court term starts with test of political affiliations for judges. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:00 pm
“Supreme Court struggles with when police may enter home for safety checks or suicide threats”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:58 am
” Briefly: In a series at RegBlog, Allison Hoffman looks at the Court’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:03 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court considers whether predecessors made a mistake 40 years ago. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:48 am
Washington, D.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:22 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Trump’s Supreme Court nominees appear to differ on immigration case. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:57 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court weighs whether its ruling requiring unanimous juries should be applied retroactively. [read post]
