Search for: "White v. Department Of Corrections" Results 481 - 500 of 785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
Even government websites as prestigious as the White House and the Department of Justicehave removed and altered web content without indicating that a document has been revised and/ or replaced with a new version. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
On July 30, 1974, President Nixon released the White House tape recordings to comply with a U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm by Marty Lederman
  But that unresolved question hardly matters, because even if we assume that discrimination against that employee would otherwiseconstitute a preference for employees “of a particular religion,” Rose Saxe is correct that the coreligionist exemption would not offer any support to the employer in such a case:  The case law firmly establishes that employers cannot invoke that exemption to engage in a form of discrimination that is otherwise proscribed by Title VII or… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Joy Waltemath
The lower court’s grant of summary judgment and a jury verdict in favor of his employer on his retaliation claims were affirmed, however (Abrams v Department of Public Safety, State of Connecticut, July 14, 2014, Wesley, R). [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm by Ken Chan
RicePhoto credit: Irving Rusinow, Department of Agriculture / National Archives.When we study the history of racial segregation in America, the landmark cases are Plessy v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:59 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
New York State Department of Correctional Services, a summary order decided on May 9. [read post]
25 May 2014, 10:36 am by Howard Friedman
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 2014 Pa. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:50 am by Joy Waltemath
For example, with a policy that leads to the firing of 90 black officers and no white officers in a department with 500 black officers and 1,200 white officers, the four-fifths rule would indicate disparate impact, because the zero percent firing rate for white officers is less than four-fifths of the 18 percent rate for black officers. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
Michigan Department of Corrections, 2014 U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Hobbs, 13-6827, the petitioner, a Muslim, argues that the Arkansas Department of Corrections’ no-beard grooming policy violates the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
” The appeals court noted that the Supreme Court addressed this issue at some length in White v Burlington N & Santa Fe Ry Co, holding that “[w]hether a particular reassignment is materially adverse depends upon the circumstances of the particular case,” and “should be judged from the perspective of a reasonable person in the plaintiff’s position, considering ‘all the circumstances. [read post]