Search for: "Williams v. North Carolina"
Results 481 - 500
of 700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2016, 7:52 am
Law as politics, like North Carolina’s HB 2 “bathroom bill. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
A few years back in Georgia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 4:16 am
” Yesterday evening the Supreme Court, at the request of North Carolina Republicans, agreed to put a hold on a lower-court order to redraw the state’s congressional districts, which the lower court had invalidated as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:51 pm
” William T. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Williams v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., 28 Cal. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:05 pm
University of North Carolina, which barred the use of race-based affirmative action policies in college admissions, spurred the movement further. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:10 pm
North Dakota and National Bellas Hess v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am
Federal Election Commission and Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
The prospect of enacting an Unborn Victims of Violence Act in North Carolina. 28 N.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
The federal district court decision in the case of Bell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:22 pm
Moreover, North Carolina’s appellate courts had broadly interpreted the term for years—even when it was more narrowly defined. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
North Carolina, 13-504; Maxwell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm
The Romano decision is currently awaiting review from the North Carolina Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In Kilbourn v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
In 1978, Justice William Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
