Search for: "Yorker v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 758
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 7:34 am
Circling back to New York Penal Law 155.30(5), in People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:49 am
Jeffrey Toobin’s recent piece in the New Yorker has me scratching my head. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:15 pm
New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 U.S. 496, 516 (1991). [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
Employee Benefits Legal Blog Dec 17 PPACA and Penalties: State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or destroyed… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or destroyed… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See, for example, Campbell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
In Fields v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
In Fields v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
The Seventh Circuit has now held in Flava Works, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:37 pm
In Biro v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 11:07 am
But I fear that the arguments, no matter how eloquently stated, are unlikely to move the political system in any fun [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Flava Works, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 12:52 pm
Here is the abstract: Less than a week after the Roberts Court issued its decision in National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, Jeffrey Toobin, writing in The New Yorker, compared the first part of Chief Justice John Roberts's opinion, in which he found that the Commerce Clause did not authorize Congress to enact the "individual mandate" section of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that requires all individuals to buy health insurance, with an Ayn Rand… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
But DOMA subjects gay and lesbian married New Yorkers to a form of second-class citizenship. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:38 pm
District Judge Jeffrey White ruled in Golinski v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:45 pm
Obamacare in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
” As part of this blog’s symposium on NFIB v. [read post]
