Search for: "Young v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 3,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2008, 5:36 am
  Traditionally, N.Y. has been one of the few states in the United States that did  NOT permit a “bad faith” claim against an insurance carrier except under VERY limited circumstances. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional… [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
:  GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Hearron gave what I thought were suboptimal answers, but the correct answers ought not to have damaged his overall case.The second set of questions arose in the first case but primarily were discussed in the second one, United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:57 am
United States, and it involves a question that comes up frequently in federal criminal cases. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 9:11 am by admin
” Added Adey Fisseha, a NILC policy attorney, “Today’s decision also highlights a gap in federal immigration law: For thousands of undocumented young people who have grown up in the United States, there is no pathway to legal status to allow them to contribute fully to our society. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Its brief highlights how hate speech laws have been weaponized in other countries and even in the United States against "those who simply adhere to and express traditional moral views that are unpopular with those in power. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 4:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which the Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
May 9, 2007) in invalidating for obviousness a patent relating to an electronic learning device to help young children read phonetically. [read post]