Search for: "BANKS V. STATE" Results 4981 - 5000 of 15,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am by CMS
The Quincecare duty (so called because it was first set out by Steyn J in Barclays Bank plc v Quincecare Ltd [1992] 4 All ER 363) provides that a bank will be liable to its customer in negligence if it makes a payment in circumstances where it had reasonable grounds for believing that the payment instruction was an attempt to misappropriate the funds of its customer. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
In December 2008, the law firm sued the bank in state court. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am by Conor McEvily
  For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:14 am by Jon Sands
O'Scannlain worries that a state could not appeal an erroneous order that stops short of ordering release.U.S. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
First Interstate Bank (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1410 (Biljac) was wrong. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Ilya Somin
Hamilton Bank, a 1985 decision that makes it virtually impossible to bring many types of takings cases in federal court. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
And in Bank of America v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]