Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 4981 - 5000 of 5,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2007, 12:05 pm
Magazine covers have been awarded trade dress protection,Time Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:45 am
They can barely manage to care for the approximately 6,000 horses already in the system. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
I think this period, which the field survived (some would say, just barely), casts a long shadow over today’s developments. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
Welcome to theMartin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 11:02 am
Justices Souter and Scalia seemed to be arguing more with each other than with the attorneys on Tuesday, January 9, when the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Schriro v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 5:44 am
Y otras veces, de que la regulación es mala, lo cual ya no será un problema de "seguridad jurídica" (previsibilidad de las reglas), sino de "justicia" (que la regla no te gusta).Y que la sanción de leyes con vigencia diferida evite litigiosidad o conflicto no es seguro: véase lo que pasó con la "Ley Antitabaco", que le dio a los bares un año para adaptarse, y… [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 2:51 pm
In another case on standing, the CAFC determined that Propat, a bare licensee, did not have standing. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 10:43 am
But Buell-Wilson demonstrates much that is wrong with the current liability regime, including the fact that the media is so jaded by litigation abuse that a $368 million verdict is barely newsworthy.I have a related letter to the editor in the Jan. 1 Legal Times. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 9:36 am
That's especially ridiculous since barely any Texas cases go to trial: statewide >99% end in plea bargains. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
Scholars have offered theories of dilution, but the law is only barely congruent with, e.g., Schechter's theory. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
" Aside from this bare assertion, however, no explanation is given to support the proffered interpretation. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
Merrill barely talks about patents on discoveries. [read post]