Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 29,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 10:40 am
Encounter between officer and defendant in parking lot of convenience store was consensual "An encounter between a police officer and a defendant, as the defendant was walking to his car at a convenience store, in which the officer asked the defendant if he had anything was illegal, was consensual thus did not violate the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:15 am
Diaz-Lizaraza, 981 F.2d 1216, 1223 (11th Cir. 1993) (agents reasonably activated defendant's pager to confirm its number). [read post]
15 May 2008, 5:04 am
Williams, 633 F.2d 742, 744 (8th Cir. 1980). [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:42 am
Sealed Defendant #1, 06-1590-cv (2nd Cir. 2008). [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:30 am
World Airlines, Inc., 828 F.2d 546, 551 (9th Cir. 1987); and Kanter v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 7:46 am
Beyond just the defendant's use, the fourth factor considers the impact of unrestricted and widespread conduct of the sort engaged in by the defendant. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
., No. 3:09-CV-01568-F and related cases, (N.D. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:58 am
Twelve strangers, vetted by both parties, are tasked with deciding the fate of a criminal defendant. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
Ambert, 561 F.3d 1202 (11th Cir. 2009), but were raised apparently for preservation purposes. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:01 am
Owens, 167 F.3d 739, 747 n.4 (1st Cir. 1999). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:19 am
., LLC, 604 F.3d 156, 2010 WL 1782435 (4th Cir. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
Defendants moved for summary judgment. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 4:50 pm
Roxane Labs., 903 F.3d 1310 1328 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 11:07 am
" 462 F.3d at 404. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
F&R’s bill was more than $7 million. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
See G.S. 20-179(f)(2) (requiring Level Four punishment when aggravating factors are substantially counterbalanced by mitigating factors). [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 5:02 am
" … A court may dismiss the charges against a defendant "[i]f there is no question that a defendant's speech is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:23 am
P. 34.Plaintiff, an American company, sought to compel defendant’s production of documents, including information related to customer complaints and defendant’s technical support of non-customers. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:27 am
, 396 F.3d 500 (U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 5:00 am
Six pages of trial transcript later, f-bomb number 2, and Contempt #2. [read post]
