Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 4981 - 5000 of 5,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2007, 7:30 am
Phase 1 involves a small initial study, usually with less than 100 subjects, and focuses on toxicity. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 7:25 am
The burden is on the party alleging prejudice to prove (1) that the publicity is prejudicial, (2) that a juror has been exposed to the prejudicial material, and (3) that the juror's decision was influenced by the prejudicial material. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:02 pm
Nothing in subsection A shall prevent or limit the liability of a spaceflight entity if the spaceflight entity does any one or more of the following:1. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:24 am
The court was also cognizant of the fact that plaintiff continued to use the tractor for approximately 100 hours even after the accident occurred. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 3:08 am
The success of this appeal does not mean that the shape is registrable, warns the IPKat. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:12 pm
  (Virginia is the only other state that does it that way.) [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
Hamilton, 273 Ga.App. 435, 437(1) (615 S.E.2d 239) (2005). [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 11:37 am
(a) Definitions- Section 100 is amended by adding at the end the following:`(f) The term `inventor' means the individual or, if a joint invention, the individuals collectively who invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
The prosecutor does not have the authority to withhold any information, anywhere in his file, from the defense. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:35 am
The Initiative adopted a three-prong approach focussing on: 1) code updates, 2) international and 3) intellectual property. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:04 am
(a) Definitions- Section 100 is amended by adding at the end the following:`(f) The term `inventor' means the individual or, if a joint invention, the individuals collectively who invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 11:15 am
Mutual Development Corp., [1971] 5 W.W.R. 97 (B.C.C.A.) at pp. 100 and 105; Donald Campbell & Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 12:40 pm
Before the 2005 Tort Reform Act, if a person got involved in any type of multi-party mix up that caused another person harm, the person that caused the harm whether they shouldered 90% of the blame or 10% of the blame could be held responsible for 100% of the damages. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:17 am
(a) Definitions- Section 100 is amended by adding at the end the following:`(f) The term `inventor' means the individual or, if a joint invention, the individuals collectively who invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:49 am
With attacks at a two year high, 100 Iraqis dying daily, and dissent from the Joint Chiefs, Mr. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
If the answer to Question in 1 is in the affirmative: is the type of use of the trade mark described in Question 1 an indication of the kind or quality of the model car within the meaning of Article 6(1)(а) of the Trade Mark Directive? [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, Congressional Oversight, Party Loyalty, and Separation of Powers (Feb. 10, 2006)20. [read post]