Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 4981 - 5000
of 5,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
Supreme Court’s decision does not directly apply to employers, we understand the ruling has sparked concern about the future of DEI efforts in many organizations. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
Although this is “so framed as to have, as nearly as practicable, the same effect as Art 57 (see s.130(7) of the Act)”, “capable” does convey a flavour of concreteness about what the invention must be for. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:02 pm
§ 1395ww(d)(5)(F)(vi)(I) and (II). [read post]
30 May 2021, 12:09 pm
“Harass” or “harassing” means knowing conduct which is not necessary to accomplish a purpose that is reasonable under the circumstances, that would cause a reasonable person emotional distress and does cause emotional distress to another. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
(B) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX - In the case of a taxable year to which section 26(a)(2) does not apply, the credit allowed under subpart A for any taxable year (determined after application of paragraph (1)) by reason of subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the excess of -- (i) the sum of the regular tax liability (as defined in section 26(b)) plus the tax imposed by section 55, over (ii) the sum of the credits allowable under subpart A (other than this section) and section 27 for the… [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:40 am
And spectacularly, for this state, does not mean superficially or epiphenomenally. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
§ 101(31): The term “insider” includes — (A) if the debtor is an individual— (i) relative of the debtor or of a general partner of the debtor; (ii) partnership in which the debtor is a general partner; (iii) general partner of the debtor; or (iv) corporation of which the debtor is a director, officer, or person in control; (B) if the debtor is a corporation— (i) director of the debtor; (ii) officer of the debtor; (iii) person in control of the debtor; (iv)… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
The letter does not begin to satisfy me that Ms Lees was at the material time suffering from a disorder of the severity required by the Regulations. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
View the article here This is not SO related, but shows the pure stupidity of the legislature(s). 04/16/2009 It wasn't quite the firing on Fort Sumter that launched the Civil War. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
Yes, this absolutely can and does happen, even for employees who have seemingly been loyal and valuable workers for many years. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
VI. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:51 pm
If a CBA in place on the effective date of the order does not address COVID-19 related provisions, the employer must comply with the order unless and until the agreement is amended to expressly waive in clear and unambiguous terms set forth in the agreement. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Today, online intermediaries voluntarily seek to combat digital hatred, often addressing hate speech in their Terms of Service Agreements or Community Guidelines. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:37 pm
A single authorization for the sale of PHI does not travel downstream with the PHI as it is sold. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:30 pm
My verdict on Ontario's MMP Referendum is now in.The Top Line I will be voting against the Ontario MMP proposal in the October 10, 2007 Provincial Referendum. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:55 am
Read in conjunction with the third executive order closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, the government will now have to decide what to do with these prisoners-- whether to release them, try them in the criminal process, try them by traditional courts martial, or create a new set of procedures to try them (that is because, according to the third executive order reprinted below, the Administration is not going to use the military tribunals created by the Military Commissions Act of… [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:47 pm
VI. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
Mr Mulcaire argued that: (i) Information obtained by Mr Mulcaire from intercepting the voice messages of Ms Phillips and/or Mr Coogan was not ‘intellectual property’ and therefore section 72 cannot apply; (ii) If the information in question was ‘intellectual property’: (a) Mr Mulcaire would, if he were required to provide all the information ordered by Mann J, and some of the information ordered by Vos J, be at risk of being prosecuted for an offence which… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
More specifically, subsection 10(9)(b) of CASL, which is one category of implied consent under the new legislation, provides: “(9) Consent is implied for the purpose of section 6 only if … (b) the person to whom the message is sent has conspicuously published, or has caused to be conspicuously published, the electronic address to which the message is sent, the publication is not accompanied by a statement that the person does not wish to receive unsolicited commercial… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Nor does it impose its own notion of a child's best interests on a family. [read post]
