Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
In the Fifth Circuit case of Todd v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:30 pm
The Stonegate Pub Company judgment contains a useful review of English law relating to the doctrine of subrogation in contracts of indemnity particularly insurance, which the court said were of direct relevance. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
Prisoner Votes… Carl Gardner, writing at his Head of Legal blog, considers the current position on the right of prisoners to vote in a most useful analysis of the UK Supreme Court judgment: R (Chester) v Justice Secretary, McGeoch v Lord President. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
("Pioneer") v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
Prisoner Votes… Carl Gardner, writing at his Head of Legal blog, considers the current position on the right of prisoners to vote in a most useful analysis of the UK Supreme Court judgment: R (Chester) v Justice Secretary, McGeoch v Lord President. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:30 am
Readers of the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Daimler Chrysler v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:14 pm
Under Celotex Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
The last time an English sovereign appeared in court was Charles I in 1649, with terminal consequences. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
” The Court of Appeals recently reiterated that sentiment in Thyroff v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:42 am
But Penguin Toilets, the Defendant in Roth v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:40 pm
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:48 am
The article considers his Honour’s dismissal of the Commissioner’s argument that the Federal Court decision in JMVB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Camoflag Pty Ltd ((2006) 154 FCR 348) should be followed by holding that the word “inventor” in the Patents Act bears its ordinary English meaning and refers to the person who makes or devises the invention. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2025, 11:42 pm
Regular readers will recall R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin), in which the claimants argued that the fact that legal recognition of religious wedding ceremonies under English law did not extend to weddings carried out in accordance with their humanist beliefs discriminated against them unjustifiably and breached their Convention rights under Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 6:06 am
Interestingly, in an English case of the UK counter patent (MSD v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:37 am
Abbott Flanders v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:48 am
The recent opinion in Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
