Search for: "F. v. R."
Results 4981 - 5000
of 20,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2017, 10:28 am
Samson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:47 am
Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co., 780 F.3d 1376, 1381 (Fed. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:23 am
On February 24, 2017, Judge Joseph F. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:53 am
On March 10, 2017, in Evans v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:42 am
Because the drivers engaged in neither packing for shipment nor packing for distribution, the district court erred in granting the employer summary judgment as to the meaning of Exemption F (O’Connor v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 5:16 am
The latest issue of Archiv des Völkerrechts (Vol. 54, no. 4, December 2016) is out. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:08 am
As Lévêque and Ménière point out-- “the mainstream view is that the rationale for [F]RAND is to mitigate holdup and that the R in RAND stands for the level of royalty resulting from competition in advance of standard selection (pp. 5-6). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm
From Tuesday’s decision in O’Connor v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:36 am
Samsung, 809 F.3d 633, 641, 645 (Fed. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:36 am
Samsung, 809 F.3d 633, 641, 645 (Fed. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:04 am
Sakkab, 803 F.3d at 439. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:56 am
Ratner Paul Williams & Laura Livingston, reviewing Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War, by Orde F. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm
Part 133, the FDA allows only a limited number of cheese types to be made with raw milk so long as the cheese is cured at a temperature of not less than 35°F for not less than 60 days. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:13 pm
R (on the application of Halvai) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2017) QBD (Admin) (Sara Cockerill QC) 09/03/2017 (Only on lawtel as an extempore judgment, as far as I can see) This was a judicial review of H&F’s refusal of Discretionary Housing Payments to Ms H. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:30 am
Part V provides thumbnail summaries of each the chapters that follow. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:52 am
With that in mind, discovery will be needed to determine if an employer’s reduction in force was justified by business necessity and whether a less-discriminatory alternative might have sufficed (Scamman v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm
R. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 6:04 am
Blum v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
En outre, il est vrai que le présent juge, à la suite de sa nomination à titre de juge gestionnaire, a fait référence à l’existence de la loi au moment de fixer un échéancier. [read post]
