Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 6,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2023, 6:40 am
Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions and attorney fees, which the trial court granted. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 7:34 am
New England Paragliding and Hang Gliding Club, et al., Plymouth Superior Court CA 2183CV0331. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:31 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
In February 2008, a Motion to Amend the Second Amended Complaint was filed and in May 2008 the motion was granted. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 4:28 pm
On these grounds, the court initially granted the motion to suppress. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
See Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:03 am
Flanders' August 27, 2008 convictions in Knox County Superior Court for Sexual Abuse of a Minor, and for a probation violation in the same case. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
We must determine whether the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of Texas Capital for more than that payment. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:46 pm
While a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge granted the summary judgment motion, the California appeals court reversed the ruling. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 7:42 am
-EV] In Doe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
The superior court granted the Town’s motion for summary judgment on the points raised above. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
Old Railroad Bed, LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 5:45 pm
In Allarco, the court provided a stay in the Superior Court proceedings pending a CRTC decision. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:44 am
She discussed it with her superiors, and by January 2012 had decided to implement the change. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am
The court’s opinion in Poole v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
From 1812 through the mid-20th century, the state immunity doctrine was interpreted in accordance with the Supreme Court case Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
We reject this view because it flatly contradicts the Supreme Court’s decision in Cutter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:11 am
In the area of class actions, it is significant that a Respondent may now apply for leave to appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court granting a Motion for Authorization (Certification) (article 578), a move which will likely have an impact on strategy in first instance and Respondents’ decisions whether to consent to authorization and proceed directly on the merits, or not. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:04 am
In Adreacchio v. [read post]
