Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE" Results 4981 - 5000 of 5,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
Posted by Vishal Gupta, Sandra Mortal, and Xiaohu Guo (University of Alabama), on Saturday, April 21, 2018 Tags: Compensation ratios, Diversity, Executive Compensation, Management Corporate Governance Deviance Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:34 am by Steve Hall
" In the book he attacks the Second Amendment decision in D.C. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
  He said that the Supreme Court, in its June 12 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:01 pm by lawmrh
Fortunately, the court’s opinion, which can be read in its entirety at No. 10–0520  IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am by INFORRM
You stated that the newspaper had paid police officers for information. [read post]
Supreme Court settled, once and for all, that gender identity and sexual orientation are protected “sex-based” characteristics under federal law in the landmark case Bostock v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Blurred Lines: Government Involvement in Corporate Internal Investigations and Implications for Individual Accountability Posted by Andrew Bauer, Jonathan Green, and Sara D’Amico, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, June 7, 2019 Tags: Banks, Deutsche Bank, DOJ, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, LIBOR, Securities enforcement, U.S. federal courts Board Development and Director Succession Planning in the Age of Shareholder… [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:46 pm
Constitution, and the states are prohibited from the same by clause 1 of section 10. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 6:49 pm by FDABlog HPM
Hilton’s August 3, 2010 decision in The Medicines Company v. [read post]
Supreme Court settled, once and for all, that gender identity and sexual orientation are protected “sex-based” characteristics under federal law in the landmark case Bostock v. [read post]