Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 4981 - 5000 of 18,295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am by SHG
And the law was established in a decision, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” [SPOILER: “They’re all tied for least likely to be successful. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:42 pm
That's, again, different than your usual case.Nonetheless, lots of what Justice Yegan says (in affirming the trial court's decision) rings true to me. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
In Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s 2012 concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
You don’t need to await the opinions of the courts of appeals; they’re right here… In State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
  Even when the People think that a trial best serves the interest of justice, isn't it a permissible role for a neutral judge to say, no, you're undervaluing the benefits of informal resolution. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Most committed pro-choicers have exaggerated fears (yes, you’re reading that right) of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Hill, Jonathan Nash suggests that two words in Armstrong v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:00 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On 26 September 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in Salzgitter Mannesmann Handel GmbH v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
As I note in the column, ludicrous as this sounds, it's the position staked out by Justice Scalia (for himself, Rehnquist and Thomas) in INS v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
In Monday’s decision in the newly minted, Matal v. [read post]