Search for: "Johnson v. State " Results 4981 - 5000 of 8,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2013, 8:53 am
This was explained by Kitchin J in Novartis AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd [2009] EWHC 1671 (Pat) at [122] as follows, having cited a passage from G2/98: “I discern from this passage that the EPO considers it is permissible to afford different priority dates to different parts of a patent claim where those parts represent a limited number of clearly defined alternative subject-matters and those alternative subject-matters have been disclosed (and are enabled)… [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Kevin Johnson analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:53 am by Eric
History * Antone Johnson on the dot-com hangover of 2000-2002 [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published three rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03356-18 Temerko v The Sunday Times, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 20876-17 Johnson v Mail Online, resolved via IPSO mediation 01053-18 Miller v The Scottish Sun, no breach after investigation 02615-18 Thurrock Council v Thurrock Independent, no breach of provision 1 (accuracy) after investigation 02821-18 Sivier v Mail Online, no… [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
On 15 November 2021 judgment in Mueen-Udin v Secretary of State for the Home Department was handed down by Nicol J. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:51 pm
"***Although Rule 404(b) evidence is subject to the balancing analysis of Rule 403, "the potential importance of evidence showing state of mind is properly weighed in the balance. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 2:40 pm by Giles Peaker
The second payment of £845 was rent in advance, not a deposit – applying Johnson v Old (2013) EWCA 415 (our report). [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Johnson that the Equal Protection Clause requires the state to treat people as individuals. [read post]