Search for: "Kevin Reading" Results 4981 - 5000 of 7,138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
“Crime and Punishment,” reads the tagline on the issue’s cover. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:49 am
In general, it said, the Supreme Court reads “knowingly” in a way that does not criminalize innocent conduct. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:30 am by Gene Takagi
 You can read reviews of the book by Fast Company and Philanthropy 2173. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:51 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller Against my better judgment, I read the 11th Circuit’s opinion in Mamani v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:52 pm by Stephen Page
Peter even has a t-shirt that reads “Real men in Maribyrnong say NO to violence against women. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:52 pm by Stephen Page
Peter even has a t-shirt that reads “Real men in Maribyrnong say NO to violence against women. [read blog]
2 Sep 2011, 7:43 am by Candace Cathey
Also, being a DALL member introduced me to Jane Reynolds, Kevin Miles, Barbara Fullerton, Terri Lawrence, Donna Bostic and others. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:47 am by Derrick Dominguez
With the symbolic end of summer rapidly approaching (read: Labor Day weekend), many of you are firing up the ol’ grill for one last hurrah in the sun. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:41 am by Kevin Jon Heller
  Marko reads paragraph 73 to mean that the Palmer Committee has “implicitly taken the recognition of belligerency route,” but that is certainly not the only interpretation. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:10 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
That certainly seemed to be the consensus among commenters when Kevin Jon Heller posed the issue on Opinio Juris last year. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:16 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
My cyberspace friend Kevin Jon Heller (Opinio Juris and University of Melbourne, Melbourne Law... [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 10:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2011) One critical reading of this case is that the Federal Circuit intends to continue to take steps to ensure that important chemical formulation patents are considered valid. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm by Scott Dodson
One wouldn’t guess that from reading recent Supreme Court decisions. [read post]