Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 4981 - 5000
of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
20th Century Fox Accuses Kim Dotcom of Asset Freeze Breach https://t.co/QLvwXCAeoU -> INDUCED INFRINGEMENT BECOMES MORE DIFFICULT TO DEFEND https://t.co/p7GDV1aHCI -> BASCOM v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
A Washington, D.C. products liability case generally requires that a plaintiff prove that a product was defective when it left the defendant’s control, that there was no substantial change in the product’s condition before it reached the consumer, that the product was unreasonably dangerous, and that the product’s defect caused the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
29 May 2014, 11:03 am
In order to prove someone is liable under the UTSA, a plaintiff must establish that its information which was misappropriated was a “trade secret. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am
Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, LLP, cannot be held vicariously liable for Dougherty’s primary liability absent a cognizable theory of liability against Dougherty (see Karaduman v Newsday, Inc., 51 NY2d 531, 546 [1980]; Pereira v St. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:15 am
It was alleged that the accident that had been partly caused by the inadequate maintenance of a lorry by the first defendant, Volvo. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
The District Court rejected Plaintiff’s argument that the home-state exception applied finding defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 5:49 am
Held: On the duty of care in tort, the usual rule that a defendant was not liable for negligence committed by an independent contractor carrying out the work for which they had been engaged applied. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:51 pm
Defendants also claim that JP Bank should have produced Shirley Herring's affidavit since she signed the Credit Account Agreement. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:35 am
In both 4664(b) and 4664(c), defendant is proving overlap. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:10 am
” “Where the public entity’s relationship to the dangerous property is not clear, aid may be sought by inquiring whether the particular defendant had control, in the sense of power to prevent, remedy or guard against the dangerous condition; whether his ownership is a naked title or whether it is coupled with control; and whether a private defendant, having a similar relationship to the property, would be responsible for its safe condition. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:25 am
" "Where the public entity's relationship to the dangerous property is not clear, aid may be sought by inquiring whether the particular defendant had control, in the sense of power to prevent, remedy or guard against the dangerous condition; whether his ownership is a naked title or whether it is coupled with control; and whether a private defendant, having a similar relationship to the property, would be responsible for its safe condition. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:16 am
The court also took issue with defendant’s affirmative defenses (“AD”) to the complaint. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
As a result, all of the forum moderators are third parties for 47 USC 230 purposes, and the defendants aren't liable for their postings either. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
If CCMSI and Advantage Health, as shareholders, were held vicariously liable on an alter-ego basis, which would turn on separate factual circumstances, then CCMSI and Advantage Health would be held liable for Bestcomp’s conduct. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:29 pm
And because the danger was open and obvious to Aaron’s father, the defendants had no duty to warn him. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
A Massachusetts trial court recently ordered a defendant insurer to produce reinsurance agreements during discovery in a coverage dispute. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
The defendants' motion for a dismissal was to be based on the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in the Pliva v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:53 am
For example, auditors may be liable if there are misrepresentations or omissions in the financial materials and statements they prepare for their clients and if the other defendants are unable to pay damages awarded for their wrongdoing in the same case, the auditors may be fully liable for all damages and not only their share. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:16 pm
Kelley’s family is seeking unspecified damages from the defendants. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
In order to survive a FRCP 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a claim must be “plausible on its face” and must allow “the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. [read post]
