Search for: "Matter of Will of Church" Results 4981 - 5000 of 6,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Administrative LawKD4882 .P76 2010The regulatory enterprise : government, regulation, and legitimacy / Tony Prosser.Prosser, Tony.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.AfricaHQ1798.5 .S89 2010Beyond women's empowerment in Africa : exploring dislocation and agency / Elinami Veraeli Swai.Swai, Elinami Veraeli.New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Banks and BankingHG1811 .D38 2010Banking on the future : the fall and rise of central banking / Howard Davies, David Green.Davies, H. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
First, the government may permissibly restrict content by prohibiting any speech on a given topic or subject matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:50 am by Rusty Shackleford
This case involves the Westboro Baptist Church, a militantly anti-gay organization based on Topeka, Kansas. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:22 pm by Chris Hampton, LGBT Project
Supreme Court yesterday about an appeal being brought by Westboro Baptist Church. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:42 am by Erin Drenning
Disclosure: As someone with tattoos and piercings — including a nose stud just like Iacono’s — I was drawn to the subject matter of this case. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
" The Washington Times has a news update headlined "Supreme Court hears arguments on church protests at military funerals. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm by Alfred Brophy
Phelps, a case in which the Westboro Baptist Church (consisting of approximately 50 Phelps family members and a few others) used a fallen marine’s funeral to further their message that “God Hates Fags” and the United States is being punished for tolerating homosexuality by, among other things, losing soldiers in Iraq. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
If context is ever going to matter, it has to matter in the context of a funeral. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:50 am by Lyle Denniston
   She made only one reference to the family’s small church, referring to it as “a little church where the servants of God are found,” but it did not sound as if she were trying to gain sympathy for it or for its strongly-embraced cause of lecturing America for its sins. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:45 am by Howard Wasserman
Dan Solove explained last March why Snyder's claims are weak as a matter of tort law and as a matter of the First Amendment and I concur in his arguments. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:00 pm by Jason Mazzone
Here, most of the signs held by the church members addressed matters of public concern, without a factual connotation; observers would not interpret the messages as asserting facts about Albert Snyder or his son; and the signs contained (protected) imaginative and hyperbolic rhetoric intended to spark debate. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:04 pm by Elie Mystal
The lawyer who says “I started banging this client so I need somebody else in my firm to take over the matter” is far less likely to be abusing his client than the lawyer who says “Sex with a client, I’d never think of such a thing! [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:59 am by John Bratt
I also think that generally, the First Amendment protects our right to say whatever we want, no matter how offensive. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
., Oct. 1, 2010), a Georgia appellate court upheld a trial court's finding that a divorced husband was in contempt for violating a Settlement Agreement that gave his former wife final decision-making authority over matters related to their daughter's religious upbringing. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:41 pm by Ken Chan
Falwell apply to a private person versus another private person concerning a private matter? [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:41 pm by Ken Chan
Falwell apply to a private person versus another private person concerning a private matter? [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The Phelps family and their church countered, on Jan. 28, that the case was not about private matters at all. [read post]